RRPS AYP Progress Reports: 2008
The New Mexico Department of Public Education has released its annual school ratings for 2008. The ratings are based on the results of the New Mexico Standards-Based Assessments (NMSBA), achievement tests given to students in grades 3-8 and grade 11 in the spring of 2008. New Mexico is generally recognized to have some of the most rigorous standards and achievement tests in the nation. Click here to view RRPS District Report Cards.
- RRPS AYP Report
- NMSBA
- NWEA
- ACT
- Quality of Ed. Survey
- Resources
Don't Let the Label Fool You
It is important for parents to look beyond the label to determine how well schools and districts are educating children.
Overall, students at all Rio Rancho schools did well on the tests, and we are proud of our children and our teachers and staff.
If you have questions about your child’s or school’s test results, please feel free to contact your child’s teacher or the school principal.
How to Use This Guide:
To view a school’s results, click on the name of the school. A chart will be displayed that provides an overview of the school’s results. If a cell in the chart is shaded white, the school does not enroll enough students in that subgroup to receive an AYP rating (25 students in academic areas, 40 for participation). You will also find links to several reports documenting the school’s results. For an explanation of what these reports are and how to read the data, click on the tab at the top of the page.
The following provides explanation about how each of our schools performed. For a full explanation of AYP means and what RRPS is doing about it, click here.
Proficiency: Indicates whether the percentage of students demonstrating proficiency in the subject area met state targets.
Participation: Indicates whether at least 95% of the students in the subgroup completed the test.
Click on a school name below to view the AYP report for that school (or another name to switch views):
| Specific CDN Reports: PED Report | NWEA Report | Quality of Education Survey | ||||||||||
| Percentage of indicators meeting AYP: 92% (23 of 25 rated areas) | School Rating: AYP Not Met | |||||||||
| Subgroup | All Students |
Caucasian |
African-American |
Hispanic |
Asian/Pacific |
English Language Learners |
Native American |
Students with Disabilities |
Economically disadvantaged |
Additional indicator: Attendance |
| Mathematics Proficiency | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
AYP Not Met |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP
|
| Reading Proficiency | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
AYP Not Met |
Meets AYP |
|
| Mathematics Participation | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
|
| Reading Participation | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
|
**Subgroups with fewer than 25 students do not receive an AYP designation based on the percentage of students demonstrating proficiency. Subgroups with fewer than 40 students do not receive an AYP designation for participation. |
||||||||||
| Comments: Colinas del Norte continues to meet state targets for Adequate Yearly Progress for all rated subgroups except students with disabilities in reading and mathematics. (View the PED Report) | ||||||||||
| Specific EHE Reports: PED Report | NWEA Report | Quality of Education Survey | ||||||||||
| Percentage of indicators meeting AYP: 100% (21 of 21 rated areas) | School Rating: Meets AYP | |||||||||
| Subgroup | All Students |
Caucasian |
African-American |
Hispanic |
Asian/Pacific |
English Language Learners |
Native American |
Students with Disabilities |
Economically disadvantaged |
Additional indicator: Attendance |
| Mathematics Proficiency | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
** |
** |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP
|
| Reading Proficiency | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
** |
** |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
|
| Mathematics Participation | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
** |
** |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
|
| Reading Participation | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
** |
** |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
|
**Subgroups with fewer than 25 students do not receive an AYP designation based on the percentage of students demonstrating proficiency. Subgroups with fewer than 40 students do not receive an AYP designation for participation. |
||||||||||
| Comments: Enchanted Hills continues to make Adequate Yearly Progress for all rated subgroups and subject areas. (View the PED Report) | ||||||||||
| Specific ESE Reports: PED Report | NWEA Report | School Improvement Parent Letter | Quality of Education Survey | ||||||||||
| Percentage of indicators meeting AYP: 96% (24 of 25 rated areas) | School Rating: AYP Not Met | |||||||||
| Subgroup | All Students |
Caucasian |
African-American |
Hispanic |
Asian/Pacific |
English Language Learners |
Native American |
Students with Disabilities |
Economically disadvantaged |
Additional indicator: Attendance |
| Mathematics Proficiency | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP
|
| Reading Proficiency | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
AYP Not Met |
Meets AYP |
|
| Mathematics Participation | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
|
| Reading Participation | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
|
**Subgroups with fewer than 25 students do not receive an AYP designation based on the percentage of students demonstrating proficiency. Subgroups with fewer than 40 students do not receive an AYP designation for participation. |
||||||||||
| Comments:Stapleton continues to meet state targets for Adequate Yearly Progress for all rated subgroups except students with disabilities in reading. Stapleton students with disabilities made AYP in mathematics this year after not making AYP in 2007. Because Stapleton failed to make AYP the previous two years, it is considered to be in “School Improvement” by the state. (View the PED Report) | ||||||||||
| Specific MCE Reports: PED Report | NWEA Report | Quality of Education Survey | ||||||||||
| Percentage of indicators meeting AYP: 100% (23 of 23 rated areas) | School Rating: Meets AYP | |||||||||
| Subgroup | All Students |
Caucasian |
African-American |
Hispanic |
Asian/Pacific |
English Language Learners |
Native American |
Students with Disabilities |
Economically disadvantaged |
Additional indicator: Attendance |
| Mathematics Proficiency | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP
|
| Reading Proficiency | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
|
| Mathematics Participation | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
** |
** |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
|
| Reading Participation | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
** |
** |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
|
**Subgroups with fewer than 25 students do not receive an AYP designation based on the percentage of students demonstrating proficiency. Subgroups with fewer than 40 students do not receive an AYP designation for participation. |
||||||||||
| Comments: Maggie Cordova continues to make Adequate Yearly Progress for all rated subgroups and subject areas. (View the PED Report) | ||||||||||
| Specific MLK Reports: PED Report | NWEA Report | School Improvement Parent Letter | Quality of Education Survey | ||||||||||
| Percentage of indicators meeting AYP: 95% (20 of 21 rated areas) | School Rating: AYP Not Met | |||||||||
| Subgroup | All Students |
Caucasian |
African-American |
Hispanic |
Asian/Pacific |
English Language Learners |
Native American |
Students with Disabilities |
Economically disadvantaged |
Additional indicator: Attendance |
| Mathematics Proficiency | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
** |
** |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP
|
| Reading Proficiency | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
** |
** |
AYP Not Met |
Meets AYP |
|
| Mathematics Participation | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
** |
** |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
|
| Reading Participation | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
** |
** |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
|
**Subgroups with fewer than 25 students do not receive an AYP designation based on the percentage of students demonstrating proficiency. Subgroups with fewer than 40 students do not receive an AYP designation for participation. |
||||||||||
| Comments: Martin Luther King, Jr. continues to make Adequate Yearly Progress for all rated subgroups except for students with disabilities in reading. Because Martin Luther King, Jr. failed to make AYP the previous two years, it is considered to be in “School Improvement” by the state. (View the PED Report) | ||||||||||
| Specific PDS Reports: PED Report | NWEA Report | School Improvement Parent Letter | Quality of Education Survey | ||||||||||
| Percentage of indicators meeting AYP: 84% (21 of 25 rated areas) | School Rating: AYP Not Met | |||||||||
| Subgroup | All Students |
Caucasian |
African-American |
Hispanic |
Asian/Pacific |
English Language Learners |
Native American |
Students with Disabilities |
Economically disadvantaged |
Additional indicator: Attendance |
| Mathematics Proficiency | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
** |
** |
AYP Not Met |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP
|
| Reading Proficiency | AYP Not Met |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
** |
** |
AYP Not Met |
AYP Not Met |
|
| Mathematics Participation | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
** |
** |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
|
| Reading Participation | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
** |
** |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
|
**Subgroups with fewer than 25 students do not receive an AYP designation based on the percentage of students demonstrating proficiency. Subgroups with fewer than 40 students do not receive an AYP designation for participation. |
||||||||||
| Comments: The staff at Puesta del Sol has already begun to make changes they expect will improve teaching and learning, especially in reading. Puesta del Sol made Adequate Yearly Progress in mathematics for all rated subgroups except for students with disabilities. Because Puesta del Sol failed to make AYP the previous two years, it is considered to be in “School Improvement” by the state. (View the PED Report) | ||||||||||
| Specific RRE Reports: PED Report | NWEA Report | Quality of Education Survey | ||||||||||
| Percentage of indicators meeting AYP: 88% (14 of 16 rated areas) | School Rating: AYP Not Met | |||||||||
| Subgroup | All Students |
Caucasian |
African-American |
Hispanic |
Asian/Pacific |
English Language Learners |
Native American |
Students with Disabilities |
Economically disadvantaged |
Additional indicator: Attendance |
| Mathematics Proficiency | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
** |
** |
AYP Not Met |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP
|
| Reading Proficiency | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
** |
** |
AYP Not Met |
Meets AYP |
|
| Mathematics Participation | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
** |
** |
** |
Meets AYP |
|
| Reading Participation | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
** |
** |
** |
Meets AYP |
|
**Subgroups with fewer than 25 students do not receive an AYP designation based on the percentage of students demonstrating proficiency. Subgroups with fewer than 40 students do not receive an AYP designation for participation. |
||||||||||
| Comments: Rio Rancho Elementary continues to make Adequate Yearly Progress for all rated subgroups and subject areas except for students with disabilities in mathematics and reading. (View the PED Report) | ||||||||||
| Specific VGE Reports: PED Report | NWEA Report | Quality of Education Survey | ||||||||||
| Percentage of indicators meeting AYP: 96% (22 of 23 rated areas) | School Rating: Meets AYP | |||||||||
| Subgroup | All Students |
Caucasian |
African-American |
Hispanic |
Asian/Pacific |
English Language Learners |
Native American |
Students with Disabilities |
Economically disadvantaged |
Additional indicator: Attendance |
| Mathematics Proficiency | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP
|
| Reading Proficiency | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
AYP Not Met |
Meets AYP |
|
| Mathematics Participation | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
** |
Meets AYP |
|
| Reading Participation | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
** |
Meets AYP |
|
**Subgroups with fewer than 25 students do not receive an AYP designation based on the percentage of students demonstrating proficiency. Subgroups with fewer than 40 students do not receive an AYP designation for participation. |
||||||||||
| Comments: Vista Grande continues to make Adequate Yearly Progress for all rated subgroups and subject areas except for students with disabilities in reading. (View the PED Report) | ||||||||||
| Specific ERMS Reports: PED Report | NWEA Report |School Improvement Parent Letter | Quality of Education Survey | ||||||||||
| Percentage of indicators meeting AYP: 93% (27 of 29 rated areas) | School Rating: AYP Not Met | |||||||||
| Subgroup | All Students |
Caucasian |
African-American |
Hispanic |
Asian/Pacific |
English Language Learners |
Native American |
Students with Disabilities |
Economically disadvantaged |
Additional indicator: Attendance |
| Mathematics Proficiency | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
AYP Not Met |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP
|
| Reading Proficiency | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
AYP Not Met |
Meets AYP |
|
| Mathematics Participation | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
|
| Reading Participation | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
|
**Subgroups with fewer than 25 students do not receive an AYP designation based on the percentage of students demonstrating proficiency. Subgroups with fewer than 40 students do not receive an AYP designation for participation. |
||||||||||
| Comments:Eagle Ridge continues to make Adequate Yearly Progress for all rated subgroups except for students with disabilities in mathematics and reading. Eagle Ridge Middle School is considered to be in “Corrective Action” by the state. (View the PED Report) | ||||||||||
| Specific LMS Reports: PED Report | NWEA Report | School Improvement Parent Letter | Quality of Education Survey | ||||||||||
| Percentage of indicators meeting AYP: 93% (27 of 29 rated areas) | School Rating: AYP Not Met | |||||||||
| Subgroup | All Students |
Caucasian |
African-American |
Hispanic |
Asian/Pacific |
English Language Learners |
Native American |
Students with Disabilities |
Economically disadvantaged |
Additional indicator: Attendance |
| Mathematics Proficiency | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
AYP Not Met |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP
|
| Reading Proficiency | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
AYP Not Met |
Meets AYP |
|
| Mathematics Participation | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
|
| Reading Participation | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
|
**Subgroups with fewer than 25 students do not receive an AYP designation based on the percentage of students demonstrating proficiency. Subgroups with fewer than 40 students do not receive an AYP designation for participation. |
||||||||||
| Comments: Lincoln continues to make Adequate Yearly Progress for all rated subgroups except students with disabilities in mathematics and reading. Because Lincoln failed to make AYP the previous two years, it is considered to be in “School Improvement” by the state. (View the PED Report) | ||||||||||
| Specific MVMS Reports: PED Report | Quality of Education Survey | ||||||||||
| Percentage of indicators meeting AYP: 97% (32 of 33 rated areas) | School Rating: AYP Not Met | |||||||||
| Subgroup | All Students |
Caucasian |
African-American |
Hispanic |
Asian/Pacific |
English Language Learners |
Native American |
Students with Disabilities |
Economically disadvantaged |
Additional indicator: Attendance |
| Mathematics Proficiency | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
** |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP
|
| Reading Proficiency | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP | Meets AYP |
** |
** |
Meets AYP |
AYP Not Met |
Meets AYP |
|
| Mathematics Participation | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
** |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
|
| Reading Participation | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
** |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
|
**Subgroups with fewer than 25 students do not receive an AYP designation based on the percentage of students demonstrating proficiency. Subgroups with fewer than 40 students do not receive an AYP designation for participation. |
||||||||||
| Comments: Mountain View Middle School continues to make AYP in all areas except students with disabilities in reading. (View the PED Report) | ||||||||||
| Specific RRMH Reports: PED Report | NWEA Report | School Improvement Parent Letter | Quality of Education Survey | ||||||||||
| Percentage of indicators meeting AYP: 94% (31 of 33 rated areas) | School Rating: AYP Not Met | |||||||||
| Subgroup | All Students |
Caucasian |
African-American |
Hispanic |
Asian/Pacific |
English Language Learners |
Native American |
Students with Disabilities |
Economically disadvantaged |
Additional indicator: Attendance |
| Mathematics Proficiency | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
AYP Not Met |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP
|
| Reading Proficiency | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
AYP Not Met |
Meets AYP |
|
| Mathematics Participation | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
|
| Reading Participation | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
|
**Subgroups with fewer than 25 students do not receive an AYP designation based on the percentage of students demonstrating proficiency. Subgroups with fewer than 40 students do not receive an AYP designation for participation. |
||||||||||
| Comments:Rio Rancho Mid-High School continues to make Adequate Yearly Progress for all rated subgroups except for students with disabilities in reading. Because the school has not made AYP in 100% of all areas for the past six years, Rio Rancho Mid-High is considered to be in “restructuring” by the state. (View the PED Report) | ||||||||||
| Specific RRHS Reports: PED Report | School Improvement Parent Letter | Quality of Education Survey | ACT Results | ||||||||||
| Percentage of indicators meeting AYP: 84% (26 of 31 rated areas) | School Rating: AYP Not Met | |||||||||
| Subgroup | All Students |
Caucasian |
African-American |
Hispanic |
Asian/Pacific |
English Language Learners |
Native American |
Students with Disabilities |
Economically disadvantaged |
Additional indicator: Graduation |
| Mathematics Proficiency | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
AYP Not Met |
Meets AYP |
AYP Not Met |
Meets AYP |
YES
|
| Reading Proficiency | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
AYP Not Met |
Meets AYP | AYP Not Met |
AYP Not Met |
|
| Mathematics Participation | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
|
| Reading Participation | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP | Meets AYP |
** |
Meets AYP | ** |
Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
|
**Subgroups with fewer than 25 students do not receive an AYP designation based on the percentage of students demonstrating proficiency. Subgroups with fewer than 40 students do not receive an AYP designation for participation. |
||||||||||
| Comments: Rio Rancho High School continues to be competitive with other large high schools around the state. Most students perform well on the state achievement tests. However, not enough students with disabilities and English-language learners met state targets for proficiency in reading and mathematics -- a situation Rio Rancho HS continues to aggressively address. Because the school has not made AYP in 100% of all areas for the past six years, Rio Rancho High is considered to be in “restructuring” by the state. (View the PED Report) | ||||||||||
| Specific IHS Reports: PED Report | School Improvement Parent Letter | Quality of Education Survey | ||||||||||
| Percentage of indicators meeting AYP: 80% (4 of 5 rated areas) | School Rating: AYP Not Met | |||||||||
| Subgroup | All Students |
Caucasian |
African-American |
Hispanic |
Asian/Pacific |
English Language Learners |
Native American |
Students with Disabilities |
Economically disadvantaged |
Additional indicator: Graduation |
| Mathematics Proficiency | AYP Not Met |
** |
** |
** |
** |
** |
** |
** |
** |
Meets AYP
|
| Reading Proficiency | Meets AYP |
** |
** |
** |
** |
** |
** |
** |
** |
|
| Mathematics Participation | Meets AYP |
** |
** |
** |
** |
** |
** |
** |
** |
|
| Reading Participation | Meets AYP |
** |
** |
** |
** |
** |
** |
** |
** |
|
**Subgroups with fewer than 25 students do not receive an AYP designation based on the percentage of students demonstrating proficiency. Subgroups with fewer than 40 students do not receive an AYP designation for participation (view PED report). |
||||||||||
| Comments: After failing to make AYP in any area last year, Independence HS made AYP in all rated areas except for mathematics proficiency. The NM Standards-Based Assessment is administered to 9th and 11th graders. Independence HS, which largely serves seniors, had too few students in those grades to have reportable results for the number of students demonstrating proficiency in reading and math. Because the school has not made AYP in 100% of all areas for the past six years, Independence is considered to be in “restructuring” by the state. (View the PED Report) | ||||||||||
| Specific RRCA Reports: PED Report | School Improvement Parent Letter | Quality of Education Survey | ||||||||||
| Percentage of indicators meeting AYP: 86% (6 of 7 rated areas) | School Rating: AYP Not Met | |||||||||
| Subgroup | All Students |
Caucasian |
African-American |
Hispanic |
Asian/Pacific |
English Language Learners |
Native American |
Students with Disabilities |
Economically disadvantaged |
Additional indicator: Attendance |
| Mathematics Proficiency | AYP Not Met |
** |
** |
** |
** |
** |
** |
** |
** |
Meets AYP
|
| Reading Proficiency | Meets AYP |
** |
** |
** |
** |
** |
** |
** |
** |
|
| Mathematics Participation | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
** |
** |
** |
** |
** |
** |
|
| Reading Participation | Meets AYP |
Meets AYP |
** |
** |
** |
** |
** |
** |
** |
|
**Subgroups with fewer than 25 students do not receive an AYP designation based on the percentage of students demonstrating proficiency. Subgroups with fewer than 40 students do not receive an AYP designation for participation. |
||||||||||
| Comments: The Rio Rancho Cyber Academy serves students through online classes, and many Cyber Academy students complete class work at home. Because Rio Rancho Cyber Academy failed to make AYP the previous two years, it is considered to be in “School Improvement” by the state. (View the PED Report) | ||||||||||
About the New Mexico New Mexico Standards-Based Assessment (NMSBA):
The New Mexico Standards-Based Assessment (NMSBA) is given annually in the spring to students in grades 3-8 and in Grade 11. The NMSBA tests students in reading, math, and science. The percentage of students demonstrating proficiency on the NMSBA determines a schools rating for purposes of the state accountability system and compliance with the federal No Child Left Behind Act. For more information on how the NMSBA determines a school’s rating, click here.
Each state develops and administers its own achievement tests, and each state determines how well students must score on the tests to be considered “proficient.” This makes state-to-state comparisons New Mexico’s standards and tests, especially in math, are considered to be among the toughest in the nation.
Based on the results of the New Mexico Standards-Based Assessment (NMSBA), schools may achieve an annual rating of “Meets AYP” or “AYP Not Met”. AYP stands for “adequate yearly progress”, and refers to the federally-mandated goal that all students demonstrate proficiency in reading and math by the year 2014. The academic data is reported in terms of the percentage of students testing at the “proficient” or above level.
Results of the NMSBA are reported for all students in a school, and are further broken down by and reported for eight different “subgroups” of students: five ethnic classifications (African-American, American Indian, Asian American, Caucasian, and Hispanic), English-language learners (ELL), students with disabilities, and economically disadvantaged students. All students, regardless of ethnicity, disability, or other factors are expected to achieve at the same level in order to be considered “proficient.” Schools must have at least 25 students in a subgroup to receive an AYP rating based on academic results, and at least 40 students in a subgroup to receive a rating for participation.
In order for a school to meet AYP, the percentage of “proficient” students must meet or exceed the state targets in every area where the school is rated. In addition, at least 95% of students overall and in every “subgroup” must take the test (called “participation”), and the school must meet targets for attendance or graduation rate. A school can be rated on as many as 37 separate measures. If the school falls short in any area -- even just one -- it does not make AYP.
The issue for the majority of Rio Rancho schools that did not make AYP continues to be results for students with disabilities. The provisions of the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) require, with very few exceptions, that students with disabilities take the same tests and achieve at the same level as all other students. Like many districts around the state and country, Rio Rancho has faced challenges helping our special needs students meet this high standard.
We are very concerned that at most schools the percentage of students with disabilities meeting the rigorous standards required of all students has not significantly increased, especially in reading. We are commissioning outside experts to come into Rio Rancho, analyze how we educate special needs students, and make recommendations for improvement. We will also bring together teachers from schools throughout Rio Rancho who have had exceptional success teaching special needs students so they can share their techniques with each other and with other teachers throughout the district.
It is important to note that most Rio Rancho students do well on the tests, and this is reflected in our overall results. Most schools met AYP in more than 90% of the areas on which they were rated -- that’s an “A” under the standard grading scale.
The NMSBA is just one indicator of a school’s quality -- a snapshot based on how students did on one particular day on one particular test. Rio Rancho Public Schools uses many other tools to measure student and school success, including other assessments and the exams, projects, and assignment grades students receive throughout the year. Some of these other indicators are included on this Web site.
We would also note that every year the bar schools must meet in order to achieve AYP gets higher. This year, the state goals (called “annual measurable objectives” or AMO’s and measured in terms of the percentage of students demonstrating proficiency) went up about 10%. By 2014, the federal law states that 100% of students, regardless of economic status, disability, ethnicity, or fluency in English, must meet the same high standards of proficiency in reading and math. This is a formidable goal, and we are working hard to achieve it, but as the targets continue to get higher, it becomes harder to reach every target schools must meet to earn a “Meets AYP”.
About the NWEA “levels tests”: These computer-generated assessments were developed by the Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA) and are aligned with the New Mexico Standards, Benchmarks, and Performance Standards that define what students should know and be able to do at each grade level. Students in grades 3-8 take these tests, in language arts, reading, and math, twice each year, in the fall and in the spring. The assessments are used to measure how much students learn during the year. The charts for each individual school show how students in various grade levels performed compared to growth targets set by NWEA.
The NWEA tests are called “levels tests” because they determine at what “level” students perform. As a student takes the test on the computer, the program adjusts the difficulty of the questions on the test. If a student answers a question correctly, the next question will be more difficult, and vice versa. In this way, the NWEA assessment program can determine with great accuracy how well a student performs particular skills and whether or not the student is performing at grade level.
NWEA results are expressed in RIT scores, which permit comparison of scores across grade levels. The higher the score, the more advanced the material the student knows.
The following chart provides a rough idea of how RIT scores translate into grade-level proficiency as defined by the state at the end of a school year:
Grade level |
RIT End-Of-Year Grade Level Score Ranges |
||
Math |
Reading |
Language Usage |
|
3rd |
197-207 |
193-205 |
197-207 |
4th |
205-216 |
201-212 |
203-213 |
5th |
212-225 |
207-217 |
209-219 |
6th |
217-231 |
211-222 |
212-222 |
7th |
222-236 |
214-225 |
214-224 |
8th |
227-242 |
217-229 |
217-227 |
NWEA tests are given annually to some three million students in 3,100 school districts in 26 states, so this data can be used to compare the performance of students in Rio Rancho against those in other states. For an overview conducted by the Fordham Institute and NWEA on how state standards compare, click here.
About the ACT:
The ACT is one of the two major college entrance and readiness exams and is the one taken by a large majority of college-bound students in New Mexico. 73% of 2008 Rio Rancho seniors took the ACT, so the data reflects student performance for a significant percentage of Rio Rancho’s Class of 2008.
The average scores for RRHS students on the ACT exceeded the state averages in all areas and the national average in all areas except mathematics (where for the past several years, RRHS’s average scores have steadily increased). The charts provide trend data showing how RRHS performed against the state and national averages overall and in individual subject areas.
The final chart in this section indicates the percentage of students whose performance on the ACT suggests they are ready to master college-level work. Here again, though the results show that RRPS has a long way to go in assuring every student is college ready, RRPS’s results exceeded the state averages in all areas and the national average in all areas except for mathematics.
RRPS ACT Reports:
Quality of Education Survey:
Parents of Rio Rancho Public Schools students are asked to fill out the Quality of Education Survey every spring. This survey provides Rio Rancho Public Schools with feedback from parents on how they feel their child’s school is doing. The first ten questions on the survey are mandated by the state and are the same for each school in New Mexico.
The second five questions are developed by the school district and are the same for every Rio Rancho school. For a district-wide overview and trend data for the Quality of Education Survey, please click here.
Be sure to check out the sites and resouces listed below for more information:
- www.ped.state.nm.us/2008AYP/index: The State of New Mexico Public Education Department AYP Web site includes detailed information on how school accountability under No Child Left Behind works in New Mexico and a variety of additional data
- http://164.64.166.20/aypdl/DocLibrary.aspx: State database providing 2008 school ratings and results for every public school in New Mexico
- http://www.edweek.org/ew/toc/2008/01/10/index.html: The Education Week 2008 “Quality Counts” report includes the survey of state assessment standards.
- http://www.hoover.org/publications/ednext/18845034.html The Hoover Institute/Education Next study on state standards across the nation
- http://www.edexcellence.net/detail/news.cfm?news_id=376: The Thomas B. Fordham/Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA) 2007 study on state proficiency standards in states that use the NWEA for evaluation of student performance and growth.
- To view the Public Education Department (PED) reports on individual schools, click here.

